Community home
Menu
  • PEXA Certified Expand

    PEXA Certified

    This program will give you an introduction to PEXA, how it works and how it can help you transform your business processes.

    Discover More
    • Getting Business Ready
    • System Set Up
    • Transacting in PEXA
  • Help Centre Expand

    Help Centre

    Here you’ll find more than 230 help articles and videos to assist you.

    Discover More
    • Help Articles
    • Help Videos/PEXA TV
    • PEXA Interactive Demos
    • FAQs
    • Ask a Question
    • PEXA Certified
  • Ask a Question
  • Share your Experience
  • Raise an Idea
  • Blogs Expand

    Read the latest in our blogs.

    Keep up to date with the latest PEXA product releases, and read up on the property blog.

    Discover more
    • Community Blog
    • The Property Blog
    • Security Updates
    • PEXA Product Releases
    • Announcements | Outages etc
    • The Bank Blog
    • Workspaces
      Community
      Register
      Log in
    Apps menu
  • Register / Login

Community Home
since ‎06-09-2018
‎05-10-2018
gregdmackay
gregdmackay
New Contributor
Register / Login

About gregdmackay

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Thumbs up
First Solution
Showing Appreciation
Ice Breaker
Community Explorer
Crowd Sourcer
Welcome to the PEXA Community
View All
Topics gregdmackay has Participated In
  • Topics gregdmackay has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by gregdmackay

Re: Multiple Transfers on Title at settlement - pu...

by GeorgePolus Star Employee in Ask the PEXA Community
‎11-09-2018 04:18 PM
1 like
‎11-09-2018 04:18 PM
1 like
Hi Greg,   If the court has ordered that (A+B) transfer to B, then this transfer may be completed in PEXA (however the issue below will arise).  Both A+B need to be represented and a non monetary transfer citing Court Order specified.  NSW LRS require no evidence of the Court Order.   Also, the signatory for your firm will be signing on behalf of A + B under a CAF.  the signatory for your firm will not be signing on behalf of the court.    This transaction (despite the issue below) could be performed in PEXA today, provided you speak with SRO and they allow it through.   SRO NSW are most helpful and co-operative regarding the issue below.    To clarify the issue we have at present  (which will be rectified in Feb 2019 (R9.10): The issue with the Transfer from (A+B) to B would present itself in a single transfer Workspace also.    The problem is, due to a misalignment between PEXA and the NSW OSR and arises ONLY when a Party on title is receiving in addition to their current holding.  (A+B) transfer to B   (B on title having 1/2 and following transfer has 1/1 however they received in this transfer only 1/2) In NSW, EDR expects PEXA to perform the arithmetic and send only the fraction received.  In other jurisdictions, the OSR expects that PEXA will send the share fraction to be recorded on title and the OSR will perform the arithmetic to calculate the share fraction received, in this case subtracting the share fraction received by B from B's original holding.  Until we rectify this issue  in Feb 2019, PEXA will advise NSW OSR that B is receiving 1/1 and not 1/2 in this example.    Please let me @GeorgePolus know if you have more questions.    Regards George     ... View more

Re: Stamp duty payment

by csconvey in Ask the PEXA Community
‎07-09-2018 03:51 PM
1 like
‎07-09-2018 03:51 PM
1 like
Thank you ... View more
Latest Tags
No tags yet
Likes Given To
User Likes Count
GeorgePolus
GeorgePolus Star Employee
2
csconvey
csconvey
1
View All
Likes From
User Likes Count
Clara
Clara Community Superuser
1
View All
PEXA

|

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
  • Support
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service